🔗 Share this article

Thhese days present a very unique occurrence: the inaugural US parade of the babysitters. They vary in their qualifications and characteristics, but they all have the identical mission – to prevent an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of the fragile truce. Since the war ended, there have been scant occasions without at least one of the former president's delegates on the ground. Just this past week featured the presence of a senior advisor, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all coming to perform their duties.

Israel keeps them busy. In just a few short period it executed a wave of operations in the region after the killings of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers – resulting, as reported, in scores of local injuries. Several ministers called for a renewal of the conflict, and the Knesset passed a initial resolution to take over the West Bank. The US stance was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in various respects, the US leadership appears more focused on maintaining the current, uneasy stage of the peace than on advancing to the next: the rebuilding of Gaza. When it comes to this, it looks the US may have ambitions but few specific plans.

At present, it remains unclear at what point the suggested global oversight committee will actually begin operating, and the identical applies to the proposed security force – or even the makeup of its members. On Tuesday, Vance declared the United States would not force the composition of the foreign force on Israel. But if the prime minister's cabinet continues to refuse one alternative after another – as it did with the Turkish proposal lately – what happens then? There is also the opposite issue: which party will establish whether the troops supported by the Israelis are even interested in the assignment?

The matter of how long it will require to neutralize Hamas is similarly ambiguous. “The expectation in the government is that the multinational troops is will now take charge in demilitarizing Hamas,” remarked the official lately. “It’s may need a period.” The former president only emphasized the uncertainty, saying in an conversation recently that there is no “hard” timeline for the group to lay down arms. So, theoretically, the unidentified elements of this still unformed international force could deploy to Gaza while Hamas members still hold power. Are they dealing with a leadership or a guerrilla movement? These represent only some of the issues emerging. Some might wonder what the verdict will be for ordinary Palestinians as things stand, with Hamas carrying on to attack its own opponents and dissidents.

Current events have once again highlighted the omissions of local journalism on both sides of the Gaza boundary. Each outlet strives to scrutinize every possible perspective of Hamas’s breaches of the truce. And, in general, the reality that Hamas has been stalling the return of the remains of deceased Israeli captives has dominated the headlines.

Conversely, reporting of non-combatant deaths in Gaza caused by Israeli attacks has garnered little attention – if at all. Consider the Israeli response attacks following Sunday’s Rafah incident, in which two military personnel were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s sources stated 44 casualties, Israeli news pundits questioned the “limited reaction,” which targeted solely infrastructure.

That is typical. Over the recent weekend, Gaza’s press agency alleged Israel of breaking the truce with Hamas multiple times after the agreement was implemented, causing the death of dozens of individuals and wounding an additional 143. The allegation seemed unimportant to the majority of Israeli reporting – it was just ignored. This applied to accounts that eleven members of a Palestinian family were killed by Israeli soldiers last Friday.

Gaza’s emergency services stated the family had been seeking to return to their dwelling in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of the city when the bus they were in was fired upon for reportedly passing the “boundary” that demarcates areas under Israeli military command. This yellow line is invisible to the human eye and shows up only on plans and in authoritative papers – often not obtainable to average residents in the area.

Yet that occurrence scarcely received a reference in Israeli journalism. One source covered it in passing on its digital site, referencing an IDF representative who explained that after a suspicious vehicle was detected, troops shot warning shots towards it, “but the transport continued to advance on the forces in a way that caused an direct threat to them. The soldiers engaged to eliminate the danger, in accordance with the truce.” No casualties were reported.

With this narrative, it is understandable many Israelis think Hamas alone is to at fault for infringing the peace. That belief could lead to prompting calls for a tougher stance in Gaza.

Sooner or later – perhaps in the near future – it will no longer be enough for all the president’s men to act as kindergarten teachers, telling the Israeli government what not to do. They will {have to|need